This
is my new “friend” Oscar
Drummer. Oscar is in some crazy metal
band (Christian metal? I'm not sure, I don't understand the
lyrics...but whatever, it's not important). He also has a rather
unhealthy
obsession with
the religious studies of Sir Isaac Newton (check my comments).
I think we can all agree that
Science,
while not truth, is a progressive series of steps
toward what we believe to be the best estimation of truth as
substantiated by
physical evidence. Let’s remember that
after
The point is that many great minds have contributed to our understanding of the natural world. Scientific understanding is constantly expanding and while each historical figure in this quest for knowledge has brought about great wisdom, another great mind has always come along exposing us to something new and previously unknown. Furthermore, while it is perfectly reasonable for a scientist to subscribe to a particular theology, these two aspects of this researcher are distinct and one should never influence the other. Science is empirical and objective. Theology is not a science. It is introspective and subjective. Believe what you will, but don’t try to use science to back your ass up.
You did get one thing right Oscar.
The rapture IS coming...and its name is Space
Dinosaur, bitch.
*Ha! It
seems that our "friend" Oscar has left a similar Newtonian apocalypse
comment for Richard Dawkins!
Perhaps you should have looked into Dawkins' position on religion
before posting such silliness (of course seeing as the good Dr. Dawkins
doesn't even keep his own website, I doubt that he
is maintaining a MySpace page. However, I'm sure whoever set his
profile up is a fan of his work).
**Let's see what a modern
physicist has to say about the probability of
God
given observable evidence (you'll have to scroll down a bit to: The
posterior probability of any particular God...).
Now I'm not saying that Anderson is right
and Newton is wrong. What I'm saying is being good at physics
doesn't
make one infallible. Being a bloodthirsty dinosaur with a
jetpack,
however, does (or it at least thins out the population of dissenters).